AUC-24-0142: capitalisation decision, version 1

This is what the auditor opens for one decision: who proposed it, who approved it, what was decided, that the amounts add up to the cent and come from the cost, and that SAP's posting was read back and matched. Every value below is the raw evidence result of the Attesta app, run on its built-in demo data (a made-up pump station, no real organisation).

Decision status

CONFIRMED, read-back CONFIRMED

Asset under construction

AUC-24-0142, company code 1000, in service 2026-08-14

Collected cost

2,375,500.00 USD

Proposed by

proj, 2026-11-10 01:41:27 UTC

Approved by

appr, a different user (four-eyes)

Last audit event

2026-11-10 01:42:27 UTC

Checks

What was decided

Rule: EQ-200633 PUMP_STATION to 1500 template J1-PUMP_STATION (rule priority 3). The rule and the as-built equipment chose which assets and what split; the amount on every line comes from the cost source, never from an attribute. Both the amount source and the apportionment basis are shown on each line.

Export and read-back

• Export reference: AUC-24-0142-v1. SHA-256 of the stored file, replayed byte for byte on re-export:
  cb4984ea16eee3a5495f0c40e5fade0bc0e3921ebba186a135fe0dc23d776869
• Asset numbers recorded by acct, who is not the proposer.
• After SAP's run the approver typed back what SAP posted (document DEMO-SETTLE-0001). Each receiver was compared with the approved line: status CONFIRMED.
• Attesta did not post anything to SAP. It writes an export file; SAP settles.

The read-back rows in this sample are demo values equal to the approved amounts. Loading the export into a real SAP system has not been done; a mismatch case is not shown here.

Audit trail